The Indian Premier League (IPL) is no longer just a cricket tournament — it has evolved into a powerful global brand, a billion-dollar enterprise, and an emotional phenomenon for millions of fans. It is vital in nurturing domestic talent and boosting India’s sporting economy. For the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), the IPL is more than just a league — it’s a creation that must be fiercely protected, like a child. With the IPL soaring as a global cricketing giant, it’s only fair that BCCI ensures it stays exclusive and untouched — especially by leagues like the PSL, which at this point, pose as much competition as a warm-up match against a local club side.
The IPL is famous for attracting the best foreign talent in the world — often at jaw-dropping prices that could fund a small country. On the other hand, the PSL has a slightly different recruitment strategy: it’s known for picking up players who are either retired, went unsold at the IPL auction, or in some cases, are actually batting coaches in the IPL — looking at you, Kieron Pollard.
Banning Pakistani players after the 2008 Mumbai attacks was a bold and necessary decision by the IPL, but in today’s competitive landscape, that alone is not enough. To protect the league’s dominance and global stature, BCCI must take further strategic steps. This article outlines key strategic actions the IPL Governing Council must take to ensure the league’s continued dominance and to push rival competitions like the PSL further into irrelevance.
1) A Player Should Choose Between IPL & PSL
To maintain the unmatched brand value of the IPL, BCCI must implement a clear rule: any player who participates in the IPL cannot be allowed to play in the PSL under any circumstances. If a player, after featuring in the IPL, chooses to play in the PSL, he should face a permanent ban from the IPL with no option to return.
Such a firm stance would force foreign players to think twice before signing up for the PSL, especially those who go unsold in the IPL auction. The risk of losing out on future IPL opportunities — both financially and professionally — would be too big to ignore. This move would naturally drain PSL of whatever international relevance it still has left.
2) PSL Auction Participation Should Disqualify Players from IPL Auction
To solidify the IPL’s exclusivity and market dominance, the BCCI must draw a bold line: any player who registers for the PSL auction, even if they go unsold, should be automatically disqualified from entering the IPL auction. The message must be loud and clear — if you’re open to playing in the PSL, you’re not IPL material.
This policy is especially crucial when it comes to talented, emerging players like Corbin Bosch. While he may not be in the IPL today, his potential and skill could easily land him a contract in future seasons. By making PSL auction participation a disqualifier, players in his position will think thrice before flirting with rival leagues. They’ll understand that short-term exposure in the PSL isn’t worth sacrificing the long-term prestige and financial rewards of the IPL.
3) Tighten Broadcast Rights and Sponsorship Exclusivity
To keep the IPL’s dominance intact, BCCI should ensure that top broadcasters and sponsors choose sides — either partner with the IPL or not at all. Brands and media companies that work with the IPL should be discouraged from supporting rival leagues like the PSL.
This would limit the exposure and funding of smaller leagues, while making the IPL the only attractive platform for global visibility. When top sponsors and broadcasters are only seen with the IPL, it sends a clear message: this is the only league that truly matters.
4) Ban Pakistani Players from Leagues Involving IPL Stakeholders
To protect Indian interests and the IPL’s global influence, BCCI should push for a unified stance among IPL franchise owners who now have teams in other international leagues — like the ILT20 (UAE), The Hundred (England), and SA20 (South Africa). These owners must adopt a strict internal policy: no Pakistani players, under any circumstances.
This move isn’t just about politics — it’s about unity, brand alignment, and long-term strategic control. If an Indian stakeholder is involved in any league, it must reflect the same values and decisions upheld in the IPL. Allowing Pakistani players into leagues partially owned by IPL franchises would send mixed signals and weaken the stand that was taken post-2008.
The Bigger Picture
Banning Pakistani players from the IPL or cutting off their media exposure is only the beginning. It’s time we take a stronger, more unified stand — even if it means refusing to play against Pakistan in global tournaments like the World Cup. No amount of prize money, broadcast revenue, or commercial pressure can justify sporting ties with a nation that continues to harm our people.
The recent Pahalgam attack is yet another painful reminder of what Pakistan-backed terror has done to our country. How long will we continue to separate sports and national security? A soldier’s sacrifice cannot be honored only with words — our actions must reflect that same seriousness and respect.
Indian cricket today is powerful, influential, and unmatched. We don’t need validation from any bilateral or international fixture against Pakistan. It’s time to show that our values are non-negotiable — and if that means making tough calls on and off the field, so be it. Cricket is not above the country.